日本語
한국어
Polski
Deutsch
Nederlands
Español
Français
Português
Italiano
Svenska
// DOSSIER — us-saudi-arabia-landmark-civilian-nuclear-agreement
US and Saudi Arabia Sign Landmark 30-Year Civilian Nuclear Agreement
REL_TIME: 23 Jul 2026 05:57Z · LANG: EN
On July 22, 2026, the United States and Saudi Arabia signed a historic 123 Agreement and a bilateral safeguards pact to establish a civilian nuclear program in the kingdom. The 30-year, multi-billion-dollar deal facilitates the transfer of US nuclear technology and includes a provision for a joint two-year study on the feasibility of domestic uranium enrichment on Saudi soil. Notably, the agreement omits the "gold standard" prohibition on enrichment and reprocessing found in previous deals like the 2009 UAE agreement, and it does not require the IAEA's Additional Protocol for intrusive snap inspections. While the Trump administration frames the deal as a strategic and economic win for the US nuclear industry, critics and nonproliferation experts warn it could trigger a regional arms race, particularly as the US remains engaged in an active conflict with Iran over similar nuclear ambitions.
// Background
The agreement follows years of negotiations across the Trump and Biden administrations. It is signed against the backdrop of an ongoing US-led war against Iran, which began in early 2026 (with some sources citing February 28) partly due to concerns over Tehran's nuclear enrichment. Saudi Arabia has long maintained that it would match any nuclear capability developed by Iran. The deal also serves as a potential component of a broader strategic framework involving Saudi-Israeli normalization and a US-Saudi defense pact.
// Key Developments
- The deal is a Section 123 Agreement under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, establishing a legal framework for nuclear trade.
- A joint two-year study will determine the feasibility of building a uranium enrichment facility in Saudi Arabia.
- The agreement is expected to last 30 years and provide billions of dollars in contracts for US firms, specifically Westinghouse.
- The pact lacks the 'gold standard' requirement to forgo domestic enrichment and reprocessing.
- The deal does not include the IAEA's Additional Protocol, which allows for intrusive, unannounced inspections.
- Congress has 90 session days to review the agreement, though a two-thirds majority would be needed to override a presidential veto.
// Timeline
-
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister sign a preliminary cooperation agreement in Riyadh.
-
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman visits the White House; negotiations on peaceful nuclear cooperation are completed.
-
Outbreak of the current Middle East war involving US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
-
Formal signing of the 123 Agreement and bilateral safeguards agreement by US and Saudi energy ministers.
-
The agreement is transmitted to the US Congress for a mandatory 90-day review period.
// Perspectives
[Trump Administration]
Supportive; views the deal as a way to revitalize the US nuclear industry, create high-paying jobs, and prevent Saudi Arabia from partnering with Russia or China.
[Saudi Arabia]
Supportive; insists on its right to a civilian nuclear program to diversify energy and has suggested it would seek weapons only if Iran does.
[Nonproliferation Experts]
Critical; argue that allowing domestic enrichment and omitting the Additional Protocol sets a dangerous precedent and weakens global safety standards.
[Israeli Security Officials]
Alarmed; express concern that the deal will accelerate a regional nuclear arms race and diminish Israel's qualitative military edge.
[US Congressional Critics]
Skeptical; lawmakers from both parties have voiced concerns over the lack of 'gold standard' safeguards and the potential for future weaponization.
// Quotes
“Rest assured, these agreements uphold the highest standards of nuclear safety and nonproliferation, while relying on the world’s best nuclear technology and scientists, designed right here in the United States.”
“The US is not going to reach any agreement with any country in the world that leads to the risk of proliferation.”
“They are allowing Saudi Arabia, a belligerent and authoritarian nation, to develop nuclear weapons technologies while starting a war with Iran under the guise of preventing an Iranian nuclear bomb.”
